This article starts with explaining why standard doses of fish oil are not enough to produce the numerous health benefits omega-3 provides, and then shows why that is from an evolutionary perspective. Learn everything you need to know about the fish oil dosage for every specific need you have.
Fish oil dosage can be a very confusing subject, and it’s one of the most common questions we get here at Intelligent Labs. Officially the amounts recommended by different government bodies vary, but the US Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics recommends 500 mg of EPA and DHA (omega-3 fatty acids) a day, and this is probably the most common guideline that we hear in the industry.
However, we recommend a daily serving of 2250 mg of EPA and DHA (which is supplied in 3 gm of fish oil) from our Intelligent Labs Ultra Pure Omega 3. So if 500mg is recommended by The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, why are we suggesting an omega-3 dosage that’s so much higher?
Why Do We Suggest a Higher Fish Oil Dosage?
Well 500 mg fish oil dosage is recommended because it’s generally thought to be enough to prevent an omega-3 deficiency. Research conducted at Harvard in 2009, concluded that up to 96,000 preventable deaths in the USA every year are caused by omega-3 deficiency (1), so even the 500mg recommendation is not being reached by a large number of people, it’s actually estimated that in the USA the average daily intake of omega-3 is just 100 mg per day (2).
That’s why health experts are desperate to make sure everyone is getting at least this much omega-3. However, we don’t just want to avoid an omega-3 deficiency, we are interested in thriving, becoming the best we can be, and fully benefiting from all the amazing benefits omega-3 can do for our health when it’s available to us in abundance. To understand exactly why higher levels of omega-3 allow us to thrive we need to take a quick look at where we have come from and how omega-3 has shaped our evolution.
Human Beings We Were Born to Fish
Our evolutionary past is tied to fish and seafood. The first hominids species i.e the first human like species appeared in the fossil records about 2.5 million years ago, that was the same time as the last ice age started (although it’s often called the present ice age as we are currently in what is know as an interglacial warming period).
It marked a time of significant change in the weather patterns of the earth and the previous areas our primate ancestors had inhabited were the forest regions of Northern Africa where they ate a mostly vegetarian diet. The weather became drier and cooler and that led to a reduction in the area of forestry, and amount of available food as well. Because of this our ancestors had to move to areas where food was more plentiful or risk extinction. To put our extinction risk in perspective, 177 large mammal species world wide became extinct during this period (3).
As they moved from the forests of Northern Africa things started to become very interesting. The search for food led to the Great Rift Valley which is a 3,700 mile long trench in Eastern Africa that reaches from Lebanon in the north to Mozambique in the south. It was here that we started to see in the fossil records the evidence for the increasing size of the human brain. From Homo habilis, to Homo ergaster, Homo erectus, Homo heidelbergensis and Homo sapiens, with each subsequent species found larger bodies and bigger brains are seen. The reason is that the Great Rift valley is filled with lakes, and the abundance of these lakes mean that they had the opportunity to begin a ‘shore based diet’.
A shore based diet consists of fish, molluscs, crustaceans, frogs, bird’s eggs and aquatic plants, and provides the richest known dietary sources of the nutrients needed to power the human brain (4). These nutrients are iodine, iron, zinc, copper and selenium and most importantly the omega-3 fatty acid DHA.
Growing a bigger brain has given our ancestors an advantage in nature. But it only gives them an advantage once they have grown that bigger brain. Whilst it’s still growing it actually puts them, and their parents at greater risk from predators, and extra pressure on them for the extra time required to find food for their children when they are not able to fend for themselves.
So, because initially growing bigger brains would have been an evolutionary disadvantage. We could have only evolved these bigger brains if our environment had allowed access to an abundance of easily available food that provided the vital nutrients needed for brain growth in an environment of relative safety. That was the exact habitat of the Great Rift Valley, with it’s wetland environment of freshwater and saltwater shores of lakes, riverbanks, marshes, estuaries, and later the coastal regions of east and southern Africa (5).
A key point to understand is that we are still in the wetland stage of our evolution, in other words we still need to get the abundant supply in our diets of the nutrients that have driven our evolution to be our best, because we can’t yet produce them ourselves. However, in the modern world as we have moved away from this diet and reduced our intake of nutrients like omega-3 we have opened up ourselves to many potential health issues (5). For example, there are many studies that indicate that Alzheimer’s disease is more prevalent in populations consuming low amounts of fish and aquatic invertebrate nutrients (6).
That we were born to fish is now the accepted theory of evolution of paleo-anthropologists, and has replaced the now debunked theory that we evolved on the plains of Africa that was popularized in the otherwise excellent book ‘Born to Run’ (7). However, despite the evidence for the ‘Born to Fish’ theory, it’s still just a theory. The question is do the scientific studies that have looked at omega-3 benefits and dosages back this up by suggesting a need for a higher dose of omega-3? That’s what this article will look at next.
Scientific Evidence For a Higher Fish Oil Dosage
What’s the Recommended Fish Oil Dosage to Reduce Inflammation and Pain? Or For General Health?
Inflammation in the body is a cause of a huge number of health problems. For example, coronary heart disease, major depression, ageing and cancer are all characterized by an increase in an inflammatory molecule called interleukin 1 (IL-1), (a proinflammatory cytokine). Whilst autoimmune conditions like arthritis, crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and lupus erythematosus are also linked in interleukin 1 levels and another molecule called leukotriene LTB4, which is produced from omega-6 fatty acids (8). Don’t worry about the names of the molecules, the point is we can reduce them by supplementing with a high enough dose of omega-3.
A meta analysis study (which is a review of other published studies) published in arthritis research concluded that people must take 2.7 gm of omega-3 daily to achieve anti inflammatory and pain reduction benefits (9). The authors also concluded that the reduction in oxidised LDL (the bad cholesterol) that’s associated with inflammation conditions such as arthritis was also reduced with a daily fish oil dosage (omega-3 dose) of 2.7 gm.
The studies were conducted with ethyl ester fish oil which is much less well absorbed than our triglyceride fish oil, so a 3 capsules dose of Intelligent Labs Ultra Pure Omega 3 would be greater than a 2.7 gm dose of ethyl esters.
Fish Oil Dosage for Crohn’s Disease
As mentioned above Crohn’s disease is an autoimmune condition. The disease is often marked by periods of normality followed by relapses. One study showed that in patients who had a high risk factor for relapse, 59% stayed Crohn’s free after one year following a daily dose of 2.7 gm of omega-3 (10). Also in another study, patients who had been hospitalised with severe Psoriasis showed a significant improvement with a higher fish oil dosage – 4.2 gm of omega-3 daily (11).
Omega-3 and Omega-6 – What the Proper Balance and Fish Oil Dosage?
There is a test that measures the ratio of omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids in your red blood cells.
It’s sometimes called an AA:EPA ratio (Arachidonic Acid to Eicosapentaenoic Acid).
While omega-3 fats reduce inflammation in your body, omega-6 fats promote it.
Inflammation is an essential part of your immune response. But long-term, low-grade (chronic) inflammation can put you at risk of heart disease, cancer, arthritis, and diabetes. So it’s important to have the right balance of omega-6 and omega-3 fats.
Ideally, this ratio should be 2:1. Your omega-6:3 ratio is largely affected by your diet. Most Western diets are too high in omega-6, so the ratio is around 10:1. People suffering from chronic diseases often have a ratio as high as 15:1 or more (12), whilst reducing the ratio to 3:1 or lower is associated with very low levels of inflammation (13). You can lower your omega-6:3 ratio by decreasing your omega-6 intake and increasing your omega-3 intake. To decrease your omega-6 levels, avoid eating a lot of processed vegetable oils — these include vegetable oil, corn oil, safflower oil, soybean oil, and cottonseed oil. You should also avoid processed foods that contain these oils.
To increase your omega-3 levels, eat more foods rich in omega-3 fats. Oily fish, like salmon, trout, mackerel, tuna and sardines, is one of the best sources — aim to eat two portions a week. Although not as rich a source, grass-fed meat and omega-3 enriched eggs can also help to increase your levels.
There are some plant sources of omega-3, like flax seeds, chia seeds, walnuts and hemp seeds. But your body finds it harder to use this type of omega-3 (ALA). If you’re vegan, vegetarian or don’t eat a lot of fish you might need to think about taking a supplement.
A 2010 study found a daily dose of 2.5 gm of EPA and DHA was sufficient to reduce the AA:EPA ratio to 2.6:1, so under the 3:1 ratio that achieves a very low level of inflammation (14).
Triglycerides, Blood Cholesterol and Heart Disease
It has long been known that omega-3 protects against heart disease, and significantly reduces the levels of triglycerides circulating in the blood and can increase levels of HDL (the good cholesterol), but is a standard 500 mg dose of omega-3 going to be enough to make a difference?
What’s the Ideal Fish Oil Dosage to Reduce Triglycerides?
High triglycerides are one of the most common reasons for people taking an omega-3 supplement. Some studies have shown decreases of over 50% in the levels of triglycerides at a dose of 10 gm of omega-3 per day in patients with high triglycerides (15). However more usual findings are a reduction of 25-30% with doses of 2-4 gm of omega-3 (16).
What’s the Recommended Fish Oil Dosage to Improve Cholesterol?
When looking at omega-3 effects on cholesterol, we first need to explain exactly what we are looking at. Doctors will talk about good and bad cholesterol, with HDL being the good and LDL being the bad. However, HDL and LDL are not actually cholesterol, they are what are known as lipoproteins, LDL is Low density lipoproteins and HDL is High density lipoprotein. Because cholesterol is fat soluble and our blood is mostly water cholesterol won’t dissolve in water, so it has to be carried around our body by Lipoproteins. Cholesterol is vital for life, it forms the basis of the membranes of everyone of the body’s 20 trillion cells and forms the basis of many hormones. LDL transports cholesterol to cells, whereas HDL transports excess cholesterol to the liver for disposal into the bile.
So cholesterol in itself doesn’t cause us problems, it’s the lipoproteins, or more specifically LDL that can cause heart disease. Too much LDL in the blood can cause cholesterol to lodge in the artery walls and form plaque, this plaque hardens and narrows arteries which cause heart disease.
Omega-3 (and more specifically DHA) raises HDL cholesterol (the good one). One study with a 4.5 gm daily dose of EPA and DHA in a roughly 3:2 ratio (the ratio found in Intelligent Labs Ultra Pure Omega 3) showed a 50% increase in the levels of HDL (so around a 20 mg/dl increase!) (17). Although might be a larger than average increase, another meta analysis study showed that DHA on average increases HDL by 4.49 mg/dL (18) in doses of 2.3-4 gm per day.
When it comes to LDL levels the studies are less clear and the results are somewhat mixed. Some studies have shown a decrease in LDL levels and some an increase. A meta analysis study has also shown that EPA is likely to slightly decrease LDL and DHA slightly increase it by 4.63 mg/dL (19). So, we could say that EPA is better for our cholesterol than DHA. However, these studies have looked at DHA and EPA in isolation and not together, and most omega-3 supplements come in a combination of EPA and DHA. They are also only measuring one aspect of LDL which is not necessarily an indicator of heart disease risk.
To understand the reason for this, we need to look at what an LDL test result actually shows. When you go to the doctor to get a LDL test, they give you an LDL-C reading, which is the measurement of the amount of cholesterol inside the LDL particle. However, whilst a high reading is a potential issue, there is a much more effective reading for heart disease risk and that is LDL-P, which is a measurement of the number of LDL particles.
A good an-allergy to understand the difference between LDL-C and LDL-P and why LDL-P is the bigger risk factor is to think of a highway. The walls at the edge of the highway are the endothelium lining of the arteries. The cars on the road are LDL, and the passengers in the car are the cholesterol. The total size of all the cars or the volume would be the LDL-C figure, whereas the number of cars on the road would be the LDL-P figure. The actual risk to cars of crashing off the road is not the size of the cars, but the number on the road. The busier the road the more likely there will be a crash, and this is LDL-P.
LDL particle number (LDL-P) is a much more accurate predictor of heart disease risk than either LDL-C or total cholesterol. So, to understand how omega-3 affects heart disease, we need to look at LDL-P rather than LDL-C (19).
As well as measuring LDL-P we can also measure Apolipoprotein B, which is the major apolipoprotein in LDL. It binds with triglycerides and cholesterol to form LDL, and it is also the receptor that binds with cells so LDL can deliver it’s fats and cholesterol. So in scientific studies Apolipoprotein B levels act as a proxy for LDL-P.
A 2015 study showed that a dose of 3.4 gm of EPA and DHA per day significantly reduced Apolipoprotein B levels, whereas a dose of 0.85 gm a day did not change Apolipoprotein B levels (20). Another study with a huge dose of 24 gm of omega-3 per day (EPA and DHA) showed significant reductions in LDL-C and Apolipoprotein B levels (21). Whilst we don’t recommend a 24 gm daily dose, the studies do indicate that larger doses can reduce LDL particle count more.
Studies have shown that DHA significantly increases LDL particle size in 4 gm daily servings of Pure DHA (22, 23) and a mixed EPA and DHA omega-3 supplement (23). Increased particle size, as shown in the image above, is generally an indicator of reduced LDL particles, which is another good reason to have a healthy amount of DHA in your omega-3 supplement.
Other Cardiovascular Benefits:
A 1997 study showed that a dose of 2.6 gm per day of omega-3 fatty acids reduced blood platelet aggregation (the ability of blood cells to form a clot) which reduces the risk of thrombosis (24). Another study showed that a dose of 2-3 gm of omega-3 daily significantly increased bleeding times and reduced platelet aggregation (25).
Heart Rate Variability
Another study showed that a 5.2 gm daily dose of omega-3 increased heart rate variability. Decreased heart rate variability is associated with arrhythmia (abnormal patterns of the heart), and higher death rates in patients who have already suffered a heart attack (26).
Stability of Atherosclerotic Plaques
Higher dose fish oils were also shown to make atherosclerotic plaques more stable (i.e less likely to rupture and cause a heart attack), in patients waiting for a carotid endarterectomy (an operation to unblock a carotid artery) (27).
Although early trials have shown the ability of high dose omega-3 to widen the arteries in heart disease patients (28), more recent studies have suggested that high dose effects are only mild (29 – 30), so this may not be a cardio-protective factor of omega-3.
A review of 31 studies on blood pressure found that omega-3 could lower blood pressure, and that the amount that it lowered was related to the dose. The higher the dose the more blood pressure was lowered and they estimated the lowering as -0.66/-0.35 systolic/diastolic mm Hg per 1 gm of omega-3 fatty acids per day (31). Another meta analysis study found that 3 gm or more of omega-3 per day can lead to clinically relevant blood pressure reductions (32).
Resting Heart Rate
A study found that 4 gm of ethyl ester EPA or DHA per day could reduce resting heart rate by 1.9 bpm (EPA) and 2.2 bpm (DHA) (33).
Nitric Oxide Production and Endothelial Function
Endothelial function is the ability of the arteries to contract and relax efficiently. Nitric Oxide is known to relax arteries and increase blood flow, and because of this Nitric Oxide (NO) boosters are very popular sports supplements. A 1997 study found that a 3 gm a day dose of omega-3 increased endothelial function, and it was concluded that this was likely to be due to increased NO production. They also found the DHA rather than EPA was responsible for this (34).
Heart Attack Risk
So how do all these cardiovascular benefits affect heart attack risk? The best way to look at this is long term studies on individuals that have already suffered heart attacks. However, the problem is that there are not many of those, and so far